MAURICE LEVY (PUBLICIS) AND A FRIEND, ARNAUD LAGARDERE (FRENCH PRESS...)

Mr Robert BADINTER (Who knows every judge !...corruption !) and his wife, Mrs Elisabeth BADINTER (whom PUBLICIS Group is the Property !)

French blog: http://parodiedejustice.future.fr
Or by Google: "Fabuleux scandale" (1st link)

Main protagonists:
- Maurice Levy: President of PUBLICIS Group.
- Jean-Louis Nadal: High Court Judge (Cour de Cassation), and others judges.
                                 The Supervisor of the Masquerade !
- Christian Husson: Legal director of RENAULT, "The forger" !

INTRODUCTION
I would like to bring you proof that France is undergoing a real and very serious democratic crisis, with a legal system that ridicules itself and becomes one of a Banana Republic.

Of course, I am “insignificant”, but what has happened to me concerns everybody …. It’s the preservation of human rights that are at stake.
Rare is the case of a simple citizen having so much proof against people so powerful! It is for this very reason that the media have absolutely nothing to fear!
It is then down to French politicians to act and to make sure that this kind of thing never happens again.

TO RESUME :
My advertising concept was gratuitously pillaged !!! The copy is identical to the original !
The accused are PUBLICIS the advertising agency and the automobile manufacturer RENAULT. They have never wished to negotiate ! Never !
Instead of that, PUBLICIS has made use of its “networks” and has put pressure on the judges.

They have renounced the deposit of my copyright registration and authenticated “false statements” which were injected into the debates by PUBLICIS.
The judges, protected by their superiors (The Higher Council of Magistracy and the Court of Appeal), have intentionally validated these false proofs and non-suited the plaintiff.

The most serious element in this affair is that the PUBLICIS group, with the protection of French justice, carry out unfair trading with regard to their anglo-saxon competitors. Indeed, by preventing legal convictions, they thus prevent implicated customers going to their competitors. This is unacceptable in an international market !

And because in the actual context of events, we should oppose our values of liberty and democracy against “fanatics”!!!! These methods do damage to the image of a democratic Europe that respects Human Rights ?

It is absolutely unthinkable that Justice has collaborated to such a point !!!!! As far as the highest levels !

How could men, magistrates, millionaire directors of billionaire companies have renounced to such an extent “Human Rights” and to have shown so much contempt and to go on unrelentingly without the slightest pity, without the slightest twinge of regret on a “little” citizen up to a point of putting his life in danger?

My revelations, with evidence to back them up, are only the tip of the iceberg ! One need only search a little bit deeper in order to discover far more serious issues. One can easily guess that in this type of affair, magistrates are “rewarded” accordingly for services rendered.

Indeed, the judges have gone so far as to validate systematically the false evidence thrown into the debates by Publicis, or by its subsidiary, or by means of a professional contact, all this like simple letters in the post.

This case demonstrates to us to what extent a man can abuse his power over another man, like an infant crushing an insect.

Extract of an article which appeared in “Journal du Dimanche" (Property of Arnaud Lagardère, friend of Maurice Levy), entitled “There is neither the powerful or the weak”
Interview of Jean-Louis Nadal, general prosecutor for the Court of Cassation, one of the most highly placed magistrates in France …
This interview of propaganda is controlled by PUBLICIS
The judge is a left-winger, close to Robert Badinter, who is the husband of Elisabeth Badinter, who is the main shareholder in PUBLICIS Group …

Journaliste : Justice should be the same for all citizens, but the general feeling is that justice is more accessible for the rich and powerful rather than for the everyday citizen. What is your point of view ?”

Jean-Louis Nadal : For the judges, there are no elite, powerful or weak citizens ; there are only people of equality before the law. The magistrates are totally impregnated with these principles …”


THE FACTS :
Here is an introduction to the papers and articles justifying these links.
Let’s come then to the facts … I shall go from the most recent event to the oldest one, but whatever the case, there will always be a link between the two.

First of all, please find herewith the document relative to the “advertising forgery” which is at the heart of my dossier : a comparison between my original visual depicting a surrealist concept of a parking place transformed into a “detachable coupon” (an irrefutable copy created during the “time-lag”), deposited and submitted to Publicis in April 2004, and subsequently sold to RENAULT without my knowledge in May 2004, only a month after its presentation, and then diffused in the streets of Paris, its suburbs and eventually the Press.

The High Court of Nanterre declared a non-suit after a decision taken in April 27, 2006, completely ignoring the fact of my “copyright registration”, which showed an unquestionable date and validated “false evidence” thrown into the debate by PUBLICIS and RENAULT.

In fact, having the desire to protect Renault’s “historical budget”, Publicis has always refused to admit that the concept was “stolen” and activated it”s “tentacular network” going as far as the courts of Justice and all this without the slightest doubt.

The affair PUBLICIS / RENAULT (1st Instance)
- I deposited my concept with a copyright company the S.C.A.M. in April 2004.
- The statement concerning the certified report of the deposit was established in May 2005, and it clearly describes what one can observe in the face of contentious advertising. The plagiarism is therefore “complete”, firstly, but extremely fast, and secondly, as it was completed only a month after the concept was submitted into the hands of Publicis.

In its report which was rendered on Avril 27 in 2006, the High Court validates “false” documents which were versed into the debates by Publicis, renounces my “copyright registration”, the only incontestable “neutral” document and goes as far as to affirm that the copy is different !

Examples:
A testimony by Isabelle Fossecave, a Renault employee.
A testimony by Hervé Plumet, an employee of Publicis.
Added to these statements comes a “fabricated” e-mail as well as a pre-dated internal note.
Those who signed the statements surely heard the following reassuring words :
“You can compile these statements without fear …. Everything is arranged ! “


I sent several registered letters to different members of RENAULT’s management committee. These people are of course “untouchable” and my letters could never get beyond the “barrage of the secretaries”.

I received only one official letter from a “legal director”, Christian HUSSON, whose contents give clear warning against the use of the “false evidence” already mentioned …
Extract from the letter:
"...Having read your letter, we understand that you contest, not only the decision of the High Court of Nanterre but also the veracity of the statements signed by the employees of our Company which were produced in support of our defence in the legal dispute that opposes you to our Company and to our advertising agency Publicis Conseil. ...We can only but draw your attention to the seriousness of such an allegation. Effectively, this assertion, totally unfounded, is even more serious in that it is accompanied by threats which could provoke reactions of a legal nature on our behalf. "




The affair PUBLICIS / RENAULT (Appeal: Impossible appeal !!!)
Let us begin by which is already very serious … I then appealed the decision “symbolically”, as I decided to boycott the procedure, as one would do during the elections in a “banana republic”, for I already knew the decision that the Appeals Court of Versailles would deliver.

Limiting my finances and wishing to appear the “weakest” as possible, I had asked for legal aid since May 24 from the Legal Aids Bureau of the Appeals Section of Versailles, even before receiving the notification from PUBLICIS (emitted on May 29), a copy of which I then transmitted. In the decision of the Legal Aids Bureau, a commission gave a verdict on June 7 (I upheld the appeals delay) but gave a ruling in total partiality.

I was then appointed a solicitor’s cabinet who turned out to be the representative of one of my adversaries before the Appeals Court of Versailles, the advertising agency of BDDP&Fils, during a revision’s appeal in June 2005. At this date, Mr. Olivier Altman, the director of BDDP&Fils at the time of the High Court and Appeals Court procedures, had become an employee of PUBLICIS in the role of Vice-President.

With proof to back it up : the solicitors in question voluntarily delayed the appeal’s declaration (which doesn’t put into question my fully justified appeal, with the date of the commission of June 7 to back it up) and they clearly asked me to step down.

Renewal of contract between RENAULT and PUBLICIS in 2006 (July: Denial of Justice...incredible masquerade !!!) and december 2009 !
RENAULT has obtained several millions € (Trade discount) by blackmail !!!

Me, I can die !!!
Shame on RENAULT, helped by the french State !!! (because of the crisis...)
Shame on this judges !!!

They're A SHAME FOR EUROPE !!!

BRUXELLES, MARCH 18th 2010

---

JEAN-LOUIS NADAL, FRIEND OF MAURICE LEVY: "There is neither the powerful or the weak !!!"

CHRISTIAN HUSSON, LEGAL DIRECTOR OF RENAULT.